On Asking The Universe for Patience

There are times in life when shit just goes wrong. Not just a single little shitty thing, but a veritable compilation of shitty things. They have a tendency to happen all at once, causing stress, frustration, and a whole lot of emotions that, most of the time, we’d just rather not feel - certainly not all at once!

Time seems to compress or dilate, and because of the sheer volume of complications, everything tends to seem much more serious than it is—much bigger than it is.

Some of us are lucky enough to have strong support to hold onto while the storm of life comes crashing through, and there’s a part of us, a part that would settle us down if we had just a bit more patience, that knows we’re overreacting and that things are less, well, serious.

We may even ask or plead for more patience, knowing that there’s a dwindling source of it somewhere within us. This hint suggests that more could be had if only the universe or some higher being would hear our plea and grant it. But what does the universe do when we ask it for patience?

It gives us more opportunities to be patient, that’s what.

I don’t believe that anyone who knows me would call me a particularly spiritual person, but I do have an assortment of funny little hard-held beliefs that cross the threshold of contrasting and conflicting ideologies. One of them happens to be that the Universe (with a capital U, for some reason) likes to test us in humorous ways. William B Irvine, a student of stoicism and a great storyteller, likes to attribute these little tests to the Stoic Gods - despite Stoicism being a nontheistic religion - and gives himself a little grade on how he’s reacted to the situation afterwards.

Last year, I set out to focus my entire year on mobility and ended up tearing my patellar tendon, making it my least “mobile” year to date. Damn you, Stoic Gods! Not believing in a personal god, when I ask the universe for patience, I know that I’m really asking myself to be patient.

Another quirky belief I carry with me is that I am tremendously lucky, in both the “good” and “bad” ways. For every airline upgrade I receive (which happens a surprising amount of times), I also break a toe, accidentally delete an entire hard drive, or get hit by a car (I’ve lost track of the number of times I’ve been solidly yet gently hit by a motor vehicle in my lifetime). When something really good happens to me I often ask myself, “I wonder how I’m going to pay for this later…” and then a bird will poop in my open coffee cup.

Some philosophers would rightly argue that Luck and the Universe playing helpful little pranks on me are my way of attributing meaning to what is, more than likely, a series of random events. Don’t get me wrong; randomness can also be fun, but I like to think that when everything seems to be going wrong all at once, there’s a reason for it, even if deep down I know that the reason is that things just happen because things just happen.

So maybe the next time you find yourself asking the universe for something, think about what it might be giving you instead.

I hope this was, if not useful, then at least comical (and no, I didn’t drink the bird poop coffee)

On A Preference for Human Interaction Over AI Interaction and Why it Doesn't Matter

Disclaimer: This post mostly refers to productivity-related AI, but I do dive a tiny bit into the more artistic applications of some of these tools, and while I’m happy to talk at length about that area of the technology, it’s not my area of expertise and I would hate to inspire any fear in anyone because of my lack of knowledge. So I’ll try to keep this to the productivity and philosophical implications of the work.

Edit: It’s been rightly pointed out to me that some of the things I’m suggesting in this post will unevenly affect certain groups of people at a rate and degree greater than other groups. I agree with this argument and the way that it was presented, and while I still think that the larger societal change is both necessary and inevitable, I have now shifted my mindset slightly away from the more…. “apocalyptic” ideas that I present here toward finding more equitable solutions to these problems using this technology. In short, I’m asking myself, “Do we have to burn it down to build a better building, or can we replace each brick individually until the structure that remains is made of entirely new bricks?” I will leave the content of this post as-is, but I may write a revised copy in the future.

I’m a cautious optimist when it comes to technology of any kind, and I have a particular fascination with recent shifts like Web3 (don’t get me started) and AI. I’ve also said on several occasions, to varying reactions, that my professional goal is to make myself obsolete, and as a leader in a middle management position at a global company, I know that it’s just a matter of time before I’m “Solved” out of the professional equation.

But I’m still very excited about AI.

All around my office, I see people using tools like ChatGPT or Grammarly to help them with the tone of an e-mail they’re about to send, fix their Excel formulas, and ask basic factual questions that prevent them from having to sift through multiple sources on Google.

What I see, is people trying to be more effective at their work. There are arguments (I’ve made them) that tools like Grammarly will make people worse writers, but we’re already notoriously bad at conveying our sentiments and thoughts via text alone. I’ve heard people say that when ChatGPT can write Excel formulas it will replace accountants, but did the calculator replace mathematicians? It may have made the general population less math-literate, but it also helped to propel entire fields of mathematics.

I do understand (and have a tiny bit myself) the personal fear that a tool will take a person’s job, and history is full of fables like John Henry and the Steam Engine, and with AI we’re already seeing that in action at a pretty enormous level that is likely to spark long-overdue societal conversations about how we should be spending our precious little time in the modern age. But aside from this fear, there is a question we should ask whenever we implement a piece of technology that is intended to make work easier: What causes us to resist efforts to simplify people's jobs? Why do we seem to prefer maintaining difficult conditions?

There is a supercharged flurry of Capitalistic angst brewing around technologies like AI just like there was a momentary panicked land grab during the initial introduction of Web3 to corporations who really like their closed ecosystems and fear the thought of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), because it’s never really been the individuals who decide how this technology gets used, and history tends to teach us that better technology benefits a select few and displaces the rest. There’s also the pesky fear of change that infects us all.

To be clear, I don’t know if this will be any different, and I don’t have any arguments for why it would be. A coworker of mine recently said that people will always have a preference for interacting with a human, but that technology will get so good that this preference will become irrelevant. And I agree! My argument instead is that a massive displacement of work itself would be a good thing for everyone because it would force those societal conversations I was referring to (I’d prefer not to be first though, thanks).

I’ve heard tech billionaires the world over make lofty promises about new careers like “Prompt Engineers,” but last night I spent a few hours creating an agent for my chatbot on my site (check it out) that does a pretty great job of improving poorly constructed prompts like “I need to write an email to my boss”. It’s not perfect, but it’s also proof that if I can spend a few hours on an idea then it’s just a matter of time before someone smarter perfects it.

Previous reply was a generic letter with the subject “Resignation Letter”

Current models are great at many things, but many argue that while they’re great at creative execution, they’ll never be good at creative ideation. The concept is that they can’t imagine a thing that doesn’t exist. But what if that’s wrong? Articles and papers come out nearly every week referring to concepts like Deep Reasoning or Neuro-Symbolism, and new multi-agent approaches to interfaces encourage AI inner monologues.

So, what is “Safe?”

Over coffee today, I had the opportunity to talk with a friend who is a dancer for the Dutch National Ballet. We discussed the value of human creativity using his art form as an example. There are dozens of people who pay to see the same show, often multiple times per week, year after year, in order to see the craft of ballet. No show is the same. No dancer’s performance is ever the same. In fact, some of the allure, he says, is when something goes wrong you want to see how the dancer corrects or improvises.

And there are many things like this. There may come a day when there is an all-robot ballet, and it will undoubtedly be astounding. There may be an orchestra that is capable of recreating the original artist’s exact sound, but it’s crafts like this where we don’t pay for perfection. We value them because we see, in front of us, the effort and dedication that it’s taken in order to perform something that is physically improbable. The practice of getting good at something does have some sort of value over the result of the thing. It’s the same reason why some of our most treasured singers have great voices, but we look down on artists who use autotune as a crutch.

For me, there is hope, not only that a massive foundational disruption will be good but also that there will still be durable forms of expression where human creativity is the ideal.

I hope this was useful.

On Boundaries, Self Reflection and The Importance of Personal Time

Okay, so this is a lengthy title, so let me attempt a tl;dr for those already exhausted. Boundaries are a thing, sometimes you might not know they’ve been crossed, and the most oft-crossed boundary for me seems to be personal time/space. There, how’d I do?

I have spent the past year, and most of my life, exploring and identifying my own boundaries as it relates to things like work, romantic relationships, and even friendships. But recently, just when I was beginning to feel confident about the work and romantic relationships part (thanks primarily to someone wonderful who has been patient with me as I navigate love like a teenager learning to drive), another element popped up that has me pausing and reassessing all of this progress. And it’s this question:

What about people you’ve spent your entire life with, i.e. family? Thankfully my family has been supportive of my struggles and adventures in depression, but during a recent visit where multiple family members came to visit me here for the first time, I realized that something that hasn’t been necessary with newer relationships and business relationships is fundamental in familial relationships:

Context. Your family knows the entirety of you, and so these new pieces of you, the boundaries specifically, can come off as if something is wrong (which, to be fair, something was definitely wrong, which is why I have been chronicling these adventures) or as you just being plain rude.

As an example, a relative and I were joking and she crossed a boundary that she didn’t know existed, because for the first 37 years of my life it didn’t exist, and it was miserable attempting to contextualize why this was an issue to someone who literally saw me born.

In the end, though the conversation felt a little awkward, I felt brave for having done it. But the other weird part about this, and something that I’m discovering about myself, is that context sharing needs to be timely. But timely does not mean immediately.

For me, I needed to walk away, and to think about how best to share the information in a way that was honest but not so heated that it was adversarial. Because it wasn’t. No one did anything wrong here. So, in this case, the appropriate “timeliness” of it was between 3 hours and 1 day and it worked perfectly.

The last thing I’ll touch on here, because it relates to boundaries, is that I have absolutely SUCKED at setting boundaries lately, and my poor family definitely paid the price. They left back to the US about 28 hours ago, and I spent the entirety of that 28 hours speaking to no one, except for dinner with my partner’s parents (which was amazing, and well worth breaking my no humans rule) because the last 9 weeks, literally, have been spent with either visitors staying with me, or travel for work. In that time I have had exactly 5 days without plans, and this is a critical failure of maintaining boundaries on my part.

Prior to my parents joining, another friend casually asked, “hey what are your plans this weekend? Can I come to visit?” and without a beat I said sure. Absolutely. I’ll make the bed… All the while screaming internally about when I would have a moment to myself and hoping to some unseen god that they wouldn’t ask me to play tour guide (they did).

So here is another few boundaries I’m setting:

  • No visitors back to back. Minimum of 2 weeks between

  • I will not play tour guide, but I will happily provide recommendations

    • I might get some grief for this, but if you’re here to see me, great, let’s hang out. If you’re here to see the city, do some fucking research and I’ll happily answer questions. but I have 2 full time jobs, and if you want your holiday to end without resentment then you’ve gotta pull your own weight around here.

  • I will not spend every day with you. Or every hour of every day with you. I may not even have any days off work while you’re here. Amsterdam is one of the most popular tourist destinations on the planet which means that I get, on an average year, TWELVE people (or groups of people) visiting. I don’t want to spend all of my holiday days giving tours to y’all. I want to spend them trekking the Alps, or snorkeling, volunteering, or building a castle.

And I hope you understand. In return, when I ask to visit you or your city, I will make the same promise. If I am there to see you, let’s have a bite, sit on the couch, and chill. Don’t change your life because a rando is suddenly in it. And if I’m there to be a tourist, I’m going to be a tourist and walk around with an oversized map and get lost.

I hope this post was useful, and I hope you know (those of you who have visited) that I did love every minute of it, but I’ll not be accepting any visitors for the next month or so, thanks :)

On New Beginnings

I have a pretty wild relationship with New Year. Ever since I was a child, I have been fascinated with traditions surrounding the transition from one year to the next.

In Spain, for instance, it’s a common practice to eat 12 grapes for each strike of the bell at midnight; some countries smash plates or even throw furniture out the window. They have always made me curious about the intention behind them and about the connection between them.

My family has always made it a habit to share elaborate New Years resolutions that seem, each year, an attempt to fool Fate and finally succeed at our grand plans. I am no different, and have had many failures and some successes. This year, I am sure, will be no different.

In 2017 I conspired with my father and brother to shake things up by assigning each other resolutions. The thinking was that this would allow people who love us to decide what was in our best interest, and to create a framework of accountability.

It worked, sort of. I was assigned two resolutions to complete. The first, to publish my novel. The second, to quit drinking for an entire year.

The joke was on them, for you see, I had very little intention of publishing my novel and had recently decided that writing it had been a form of therapy and had also been contemplating a break from alcohol for some time due to a heavy party season. Now, almost 5 years later, I am still sober and genuinely love the lifestyle, but I find myself still trying to replicate the meteoric success of that year’s resolution.

This is the year!… Right?

The year after I quit drinking I decided to dedicate to perfecting sleep, and I took to it like wildfire. I read every book on sleep I could find, and the advice did seem to match up:

  • No screens an hour before bedtime

    • How?!

  • No light while you sleep

    • Sleep masks suck, and there’s not enough tape in the world to make the tiny lights on all of the devices in my room go away

  • No sound

    • Thankfully, I don’t really snore, but my dog does, and at the time of this experiment I lived on one of the busiest tram lines in Amsterdam, so I settled for a noise machine that simulates an oscilating fan

  • No caffeine after 2pm

    • This appears to be specific to my chronotype, but this alone was a game changer for me.

  • Delay caffeine intake to later than 90min after waking

    • This also was a huge game changer

  • Avoid carbohydrates close to bedtime

  • Read fiction before bed

Once I had fully implemented these changes I did see a remarkable impact on the quality and stability of my sleep, but it took maybe 3 months to nail down, and somehow it felt like I hadn’t aimed high enough.

The next year was about getting a six pack and being able to do a muscle up. I failed. Maybe they were too specific? Maybe I just didn’t care? Either way, the year after I set up 3 resolutions that would be spread throughout the year. I was going to learn FOUR languages.

Well, I did technically succeed, but my criteria seems to have been the mistake, there. I passed A2 exams in each language, but I still can’t formulate a sentence with a stranger to save my life.

So this year, what will I do? Well, first, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking this year about these past failures and they all have one thing in common, and that is that they are “Means” goals. They’re also quite static. I think I was onto something by making my resolutions last year astronomically difficult, but I lacked purpose.

I lacked a “Why” Goal.

As I mentioned in my post “The Final Why”, if you’re able to spend some time getting to the real “Why” of a thing, then the “Means” don’t matter. Why did I want to learn 4 languages? Why did I care about a 6 pack?

I think they both possibly contain very real reasons, but those reasons are hidden behind the task nature of the means goal. So what am I going to do this year?

This year I have chosen the themes of “Mobility,” and “Thoughtitude” (totally made up) and have a couple of Why goals that go along with them.

If I ask myself why I want to be physically mobile, it is to be able to extend my health span, and to feel good and able for as long as possible. If I ask why I want to have lifestyle mobility, it is to have as much flexibility as possible to account for life changes, and opportunities and to explore the planet more.

Below are some of the Means I will attempt for both Physical Mobility and Lifestyle Mobility, but remember that the Means don’t matter, only that they work for the Why:

  • Physical Mobility

    • Calisthenics allows you to strengthen muscles at the extent of their natural range of motion, and promotes better proprioception (bodily awareness), and can strengthen auxiliary muscle groups that are often easy injured at older age. As it doesn’t include any additional weights, the escalation of movements is controlled entirely by your own body’s ability to handle itself.

    • Yoga emphasizes breathwork and strength at extension as well as flexibility. Yin and Yang styles are both complementary and allow you to both strengthen at extension and also relax into extension. It is also excellent for endurance and balance.

    • Bouldering (rock climbing without a top rope) promotes proprioception, balance and grip strength and activates neurons in similar ways to lateral thinking puzzles.

    • Etc.

  • Lifestyle Mobility

    • Luckily my work allows me to be both location and time independent and so I have the ability to work from anywhere, however I have learned that this is best kept to yourself as it can sometimes make other people feel bad, even if there is nothing wrong with doing it and you are getting your work done

    • Invest in experiences in new places

    • Limit expenses as much as possible

As you can probably tell, this second one is the one I will likely have the most issues with, and I will come back to this often as I think of more ideas.

As for the made up word “thoughtitude”, this one is simple. I will make it a daily practice to share gratitude to someone who has affected my life and will dedicate a small amount of time toward doing something specifically thoughtful for someone else in the spirit of kindness.

Why? Besides it being the right thing to do, this also helps to make the environment of my life more habitable toward the people that I love (current and future).

I hope that these both are wildly successful, but know that even in the attempt I will have made my life, and hopefully the lives of those I care about, just a litttttle bit better.

On Becoming European

EDIT: This post was originally written for my future self in mind and should be read as a note to self

A colleague from the US showed up at my office in Amsterdam this morning, and I greeted them with a sturdy embrace and a kiss on both cheeks.

“Whoa, that’s new,” she said. “You’ve really embraced this whole ‘Europe’ thing, huh?”

I ignored the impermanence in her tone, as if my living here were a temporary fad, and focused on the meat of what she was saying. I guess I have embraced this whole “Europe” thing. I started to think about the subtle shifts in my habits that could arguably be called “European” and found myself surprised. I now habitually spell my words with a different flair (colour, authorisation, etc), I call my cell phone a “mobile”, I use Whatsapp exclusively over SMS, and apparently I’m now a guy who kisses cheeks.

This latter is the most surprising to me, as I have the distinct, vivid memory of being petrified of this type of greeting no more than a year before moving to Europe. The rules of it seemed daunting back then, but now that it’s a habit I can’t remember ever having even learning them.

This reminds me of something I heard once. A simple question. A meditation, if you will, on the differences between cultures. “Is it wrong, or just different?” Everything here is different from what I’m used to, in varying degrees, but none of it is wrong. It’s just different. The food has a different consistency. They focus on different elements. Streets are different. But is it wrong? No

On Creating a Meaningful Morning Routine

EDIT: This post was originally written for my future self in mind and should be read as a note to self

The beginning of the year is an extremely powerful time for creating lasting habits, with the majority of the western world participating on a mass “reboot”, but so often this time is squandered with brute-force style habit adoption.

Few people can change overnight. Even so-called “Cold Turkey” bad habit cessation is the result of several years of guilt, self hatred, and building up until the time is just right.

Enter Habit Stacking.

I first read about Habit Stacking in “The Miracle Morning” by Hal Elrod, and then again in this article (which coincidentally also draws its influence to “The Miracle Morning”). Both are excellent reads and include several morning routine examples. The jist is this:

Add a habit onto a habit you already have, and then slowly build from there. Take brushing your teeth for example. It’s very likely you already have a morning brushing routine (if you don’t… ew), so add a small habit just before that. Then, when that habit is cemented, add another. And another. By the time most people have stopped going to the gym, you’ll be well on your way to a lifelong exercise habit.

I’ve found that it’s more effective to have your anchor habit take place after the habit you wish to adopt, that way it’s more difficult to end early, since you know you still HAVE to brush your teeth. Soon all habits will be this way, and that’s a good thing. You’re now crafting your morning. Forging it on the anvil of your day, and you will thank yourself later.

On Challenging Needs

EDIT: This post was originally written for my future self in mind and should be read as a note to self

At any given point over the past 7 years I have deprived myself of something. I’m often asked, “Why would you ever want to go without ___?!” or told, “Well, I could never go without ___! I need it to live!”

This is exactly why I am depriving myself. Because at one point I also said to these things. “Well I could never go without alcohol!” or asked, “Why would you ever want to go without masturbation for a year?!” I had accepted these things as necessary for my survival due to chemical dependence or habitual abuse. I said the same thing about sugar (3 months of ketogenic diet), speaking out loud (12 day silent meditation retreat), and a few dozen other random things.

I lived.

As I write this I have just finished a year of sobriety (from alcohol), and have decided I don’t want to go back. For the better part of 15 years I just considered alcohol a part of my life. Now it’s not. I also learned a lot about myself.

It doesn’t mean I won’t ever have another drink again, but in challenging my preconceived notions about who I am (and what I’m capable of) i have discovered a lot about myself.

What is something you think you need? Can you imagine a life without it? If not, then perhaps it’s time to find out what it would be like.